Showing posts with label technology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label technology. Show all posts

Friday, May 24, 2013

First-generation Knowledge Management and Second-generation Knowledge Management Differ in their Approaches

by | on May 24, 2013  

First-generation Knowledge Management Approach

First-generational knowledge management (KM) dealt with the supply side of the life cycle only. By contrast second-generation KM strategies use the whole life cycle, both the supply and the demand sides. For instance, first-generation knowledge management relied more on technology relative to strategy in that it tried to trap knowledge with technology. This knowledge was then used to advance the business process by directing the behavior of personnel. In this process organizational knowledge is assumed to be in existence, and all one has to do is capture it. While this has been effective, it also was limiting in creating new knowledge (McElroy, 2001).

Advantages of Second-generation Knowledge Management Over First-generation Knowledge Management

However, since second-generation knowledge management utilizes the whole life cycle, this is no longer the case. Second-generation KM is involved with the creation and integration of knowledge. So, no longer are we to just rely only on knowledge that is thought to exist, we can create it. Knowledge is gained, and produced from people within organizations, thus, it’s a social process. Here, the difference would be the total integration of the life cycle. This, of itself, makes or creates the environment for the sustainability of innovation. And, again, this is so because second-generation knowledge management impacts the whole knowledge life cycle (KLC). Thus, while first-generation knowledge management works with existing knowledge, second-generation KM help produce and integrate new knowledge that impacts the KLC (McElroy, 2002).

Reference
McElroy, M. (2001, October). Second-generation knowledge management. Presentation at KMWorld 2001 Conference and Exposition, Santa Clara, CA
McElroy, M. (2002). The new knowledge management—Complexity, learning, and sustainableinnovation. (Excerpt). Burlington, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2002.
Related reading

This entry was posted in Empower Network
 

About The Author:

I am from the 19th Galaxy :). I am a Dad, husband, brother, son, entrepreneur, poet, lifelong learner... and personal development advocate. Even when I was living in the heart of Brooklyn as a teenager, I had an entrepreneur’s heart. .......If you want to, you can click on one of those links for a FREE Video

Friday, May 17, 2013

The Pros and Cons of globalization

The Pros and Cons of globalization

GlobalizationGlobalization is a set of relationships that is co-dependent on each other; these relationships are between people in different locations worldwide that are divided into nations. As well, these relationships tend to be expanding. As far as pros and cons are concerned, let’s consider the following.  Nations are able to share in new technology, and firms with innovative products can do business with a larger costumer base worldwide. Thus, this would result in increase revenues for those firms. So too, global competition increases due to consumers’ awareness, and their ability to purchase new items that were once unreachable. In turn, by clustering firms gain greater awareness of foreign opportunities. This means new investments and potential profits (Daniels, Radebaugh, & Sullivan, 2011).

Globalization can also lead to better quality of life for host nations. As well as, good working relationships among the different nations involved is a benefit through sign treaties. But, where there is an upside there is also usually a downside. From this point of view, globalization is said to take away jobs from countries with firms looking for cheaper labor in foreign countries. Wages are, as well, argued to become stagnated as firms outsource jobs. When nations join the globalization expansion they run the risk of losing some economic leadership. Also, the people of a nation who has to worry about losing jobs and therefore economic status become stressful (Daniels, et al., 2011).

Global Forces Driving Globalization

One of the main forces driving globalization is technology; because of new technology, firms can now communicate in real time and even see each other while talking. Technology, also, allows for rapid transport of goods and people worldwide. Thus, many of the good that would have spoiled before reaching its destination in the past can now arrive wholesome. This rapid development in technology, and various innovative developments, has widened the consumer demand base globally (Daniels, et al., 2011).

Example of who have Benefited from globalization and who did not

I think that Carnival is the epitome of a company that is truly global. Carnival is a Panamanian company that is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, and has its operating headquarters in Miami. This means that Carnival passengers are mostly from the United States. The Carnival benefits from globalization by not having to pay taxes in its home country nor the United States. The carnival also has access to all nations as its source of customers (Daniels, et al., 2011). Wal-Mart is another firm that has benefited from globalization. There are Wal-Mart Stores in the U.S., Mexico, Canada, Brazil, China, and other south pacific countries that maintain a high profitability.  Wal-Mart has also managed to keep its production cost low (Anthony, Kacmar., & Perrewe, 2010).

By contrast, city workers in the local police departments do not directly benefit from globalization as far as their job, or pay is concerned. Nor do the fire department, or the regular factory worker. In fact, if you are a worker and not an owner of a major company, chances is you where probably displace from your job. May be it is time to start your own business, just a thought.

References

Anthony, W. P., Kacmar, K. M., & Perrewe, P. L. (2010). Human resources management: A strategic approach. (6th ed.). Mason, OH: Cengage Learning.

Daniels, J., Radebaugh, L., & Sullivan, D. (2011). International business: Environments and operations (13th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Related post >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Click here

This entry was posted in Empower Network
 

About The Author:

I am from the 19th Galaxy :). I am a Dad, husband, brother, son, entrepreneur, poet, lifelong learner... and personal development advocate. Even when I was living in the heart of Brooklyn as a teenager, I had an entrepreneur’s heart. .......If you want to, you can click on one of those links for a FREE Video

Wednesday, May 15, 2013

Management Information Systems

Management Information Systems

Information SystemsThere are three key resources in management information systems (MIS); they are information, information technology, and people. Only one of these three resources is most important. Technology is one of the major reasons why people are being displaced from their jobs every day. Thus, one would think that information technology is the most important factor. But, which resource will prove to be the most important?
One does not have to read a text to answer this question. The answer is, and always will be people. People may utilize information technology in order to relate with and have utility with certain information. However, management information systems are nothing more than a form of business controls which can be studied academically (Haag & Cummings, 2009).

People are more Important than Information Systems

Information SystemsWhile, by contrast, people are the ones who create and gather information to enter as data into these systems. Consequently, without people there would be no information systems. To take it even further, without people to develop technology, that technology would not have existed. Though management information systems and technology on a whole help add value to one’s business.

Information System are Important to Businesses

Information SystemsIn business one is standing still or moving forward. Technology (information systems) help a business move forward; thus, businesses can compete in a high-tech world. The alternative is falling behind one’s competition. This is true, since information technology affects both the top line and bottom line (Haag & Cummings). Therefore, management information systems are important. But without people to create this technology, and then create, gather and input data into the systems MIS in this sense would not be possible.

Reference

Haag, S., & Cummings, M. (2009). Information systems essentials (3rd ed.). NewYork: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Welcome page >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Click here

This entry was posted in Empower Network
 

About The Author:

I am from the 19th Galaxy :). I am a Dad, husband, brother, son, entrepreneur, poet, lifelong learner... and personal development advocate. Even when I was living in the heart of Brooklyn as a teenager, I had an entrepreneur’s heart. .......If you want to, you can click on one of those links for a FREE Video